MaximimumPC
got their hands on a prototype system from nForce2 & GeForce FX Launch Partners
Alienware
- and posted a few details including an interesting benchmark of an “early
sample GeForce FX“:…It would be silly to extrapolate fine details about the
card’s performance from such a small benchmark sample. It would also be unfair,
considering the un-optimized condition of the drivers. But we can make some broad
guesses about the strengths and weaknesses of nVidia’s new technology. In
Quake III running at 1600×1200, 32-bit color and 2x anti-aliasing, the GeForce
FX is about 40 percent faster than the ATI Radeon 9700 Pro at the same settings.
The GeForce is almost 20 percent faster than the 9700 Pro in the Unreal Tournament
2003 Asbestos fly-by demo at these same settings. However, in the 3DMark 2001:SE
Game 4 benchmark at these settings, the Radeon 9700 is about 10 percent faster
than the GeForce FX.“
Rest of the review and the benchmark: GeForce
FX Benchmarks Revealed! @ mximimumpc.com
More details: GeForce
FX @ nvidia.com
source: email - MaTrIx
» ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Review
» ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB (R600) Review
» Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro Review
» GeForce 7950 Quad SLI to support SLI Anti-Aliasing x32
» PowerColor Radeon X1800 XT 512MB (PCIe) Review
» Unreal Tournament 2004 Patch 3369 for Windows, Linux, Mac
» Quake 4 Final Demo for Windows and Linux
» Sapphire Radeon X800GT PCIe (256MB BGA DDR3) Review
» ATI Radeon X1000 Series Previews
» New Unreal Engine 3.0 Screenshots
» NVIDIA nForce4 SLI for Pentium 4 - 1st Benchmark Results
» Unreal Tournament 2004 Demo Released
» ATi Catalyst Windows XP 4.1Drivers Released
» GIGABYTE - Gigabyte K8NNXP-940 nForce3 150 Review
» Win A $Million


del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Netscape
Yahoo! My Web
StumbleUpon
Google Bookmarks
Technorati
BlinkList
Newsvine
ma.gnolia
reddit
Windows Live
Tailrank

