==
powerarmour wrote:Haha, well that's to be expected, but yet another rename of the 8800GT>9800GT (Plus GS/GSO derivatives) >GTS250>GT330 is just nuts...
The G80/92 refuses to die..!
I think it will be forever known as the little GPU that could

Moderator: Moderators
powerarmour wrote:Haha, well that's to be expected, but yet another rename of the 8800GT>9800GT (Plus GS/GSO derivatives) >GTS250>GT330 is just nuts...
The G80/92 refuses to die..!


Engadget wrote:Sometimes companies spar out their differences behind closed doors, and sometimes they have guys like Jen-Hsun Huang at their helms and the whole world gets to know how they feel and what they intend to do about it. The Tegrasaurus Rex has taken a recent interview with Fortune magazine as an opportunity to eloquently lay out his side's case in the epic cross-licensing dispute between NVIDIA and Intel, and to let us all know that he sees "no reason" to settle with the Atom-making giant. Describing Intel's argumentation as "completely nonsense," NVIDIA's fearless leader tell us that he's eagerly anticipating the court clash scheduled for later this year. We can't yet confirm whether or not he finished it off with a "bring your popcorn" instruction, but all his recorded words await in video form just after the break.


powerarmour wrote:But getting into court battles with Intel generally is like pulling on a Lion's tail...

powerarmour wrote:Haha, I totally agree with one of the comments, he's obviously slightly crazy, but he has a massive pair of balls...![]()
But getting into court battles with Intel generally is like pulling on a Lion's tail...


A new version of the PhysX patch that allows a Radeon card (for 3D rendering) to be used with a GeForce card (for PhysX) is available.
If you read the release note there is a pretty shocking thing:
- added support for fixing a timebomb, introduced in 196.75 and 197.xx drivers (gravity reverse + overall slowdown after a few seconds of PhysX processing)

thegrommit wrote:It seems nvidia is still busy messing with people who're using ATI/Nvidia hybrids for PhysX
http://www.geeks3d.com/20100422/hybrid- ... ebomb-fix/A new version of the PhysX patch that allows a Radeon card (for 3D rendering) to be used with a GeForce card (for PhysX) is available.
If you read the release note there is a pretty shocking thing:
- added support for fixing a timebomb, introduced in 196.75 and 197.xx drivers (gravity reverse + overall slowdown after a few seconds of PhysX processing)
The video is amusing.


Computex time for Fermi 2
The new successor to Fermi is actually not completely based on a cut down Fermi architecture. The new GPUs, something that we know as GF104 and GF108, are based on a new architecture that has some Fermi basics, but doesn't have any cache. As you can imagine, the focus is on good tessellation support as well as on strong DirectX 11 performance. This is what Nvidia has been pushing for a while.

impar wrote:nVidia dropping the GPGPU and focusing on GPUs?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests