nForcersHQ
 
nForcersHQForumDistributed ComputingFAQLog inRegisterSearch
 
nForcersHQ

PC2-6400 4-4-4 or PC2-8000 5-5-5
Post new topic Reply to topic    nForcersHQ.com Forum Index » Hardware Recommendations
Login to view full posting options
Author Message
Google
AdSense

Back to top  
krips
Off to school soon...
Ultra nForced
Ultra nForced

Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 7611
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:35 am    Post subject: PC2-6400 4-4-4 or PC2-8000 5-5-5

For 2x2GB modules @ 2.1v, costs are the same. In general, which would have better chips? Thx.
Back to top
daglesj
nForced
nForced

Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 1480
Location: on the cusp of uranus

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:42 am    Post subject:

I guess the only difference would be overclocking headroom.

I never bother about latency timings, in this day and age they are pretty irrelevant. Tweaked to the max latencies might give you 156fps over untweaked at 155. Not worth the effort of running memtest for two days and all the potential crashing etc. etc.

Buy the fastest mhz ram you can afford (the 8000 could last you out another upgrade) but dont worry about the latencies. Slap it in and get using it.


Last edited by daglesj on Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:43 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
powerarmour
--[papameister]--
Mod Squad
Mod Squad

Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 10632
Location: Surrey, UK 'MGS4 Rocks'

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:56 am    Post subject:

If it's from the same manufacturer it might even be the same IC's, just with a different SPD setting.

In any case, if your overclocking get the PC8000, if not get the PC6400, but it doesn't really matter much at the end of the day. Intel C2D/Q's are not FSB limited anyway, increasing FSB/Bandwidth doesn't make hardly any difference.
Back to top
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17093
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:50 am    Post subject:

Greetings!
powerarmour wrote:
Intel C2D/Q's are not FSB limited anyway, increasing FSB/Bandwidth doesn't make hardly any difference.
Yep.
And 2,1v for 6400 is a bit high.
Back to top
powerarmour
--[papameister]--
Mod Squad
Mod Squad

Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 10632
Location: Surrey, UK 'MGS4 Rocks'

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:54 pm    Post subject:

impar wrote:

And 2,1v for 6400 is a bit high.


I agree, look for 1.8v DIMM's, they tend to be better quality/overclockers also.
Back to top
krips
Off to school soon...
Ultra nForced
Ultra nForced

Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 7611
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:17 pm    Post subject:

None of the ram I look at seems to be of the <2v variety. Maybe it's because I'm looking at stuff that's $25/gb?
Back to top
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17093
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject:

Greetings!

Maybe. Or the 4 timings for 6400.
Back to top
Google
AdSense
Google
Back to top  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    nForcersHQ.com Forum Index » Hardware Recommendations
All times are GMT Page 1 of 1


ToS | Privacy | Forum Rules | Contact | Advertise on this site
NVIDIA, the NVIDIA logo, NVIDIA nForce and all of the NVIDIA nForce product logos are trademarks of NVIDIA Corporation
nPowered by phpBB © 2007 phpBB Group  All rights reserved © 2001-2008 Michael Day nFHQ nForcersHQ.com | Fluffy-Gear.com
nForcersHQ supporters: Impar, wardog, MiniMax, envoid, jasonh, Krips, VAIOMAN, Zetro, sensai, me&er, RElliott, ScottRempel, JHogarth, IcemanIX, Etraman, KA, Tabajara, Xiomberg, ruddywarrior, hookahmike, MMoore, RHodgson, RGilson, powerarmour, Sepal, RRavat, DigitalRuin, HammerheadTech, Bane, DHunt, Fat Jez, baikal, Jumpin' Jon, MGadzikowski, JBishop, RDeBok, JDavies, HDHyland, TMorris