|
Login to view full posting options
|
| Author |
Message |
Google
AdSense
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17739
Location: Portugal
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:08 pm Post subject: What's Intel up to? - v2 |
|
|
|
Greetings!
"But if any company can go down the wrong path for five years and still come out on top, it’s Intel.
...
By now we’ve hopefully stressed the importance of Yonah, and there’s just one more detail to mention - we have one."
in, http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2627
My understanding is that DDR uses more power than DDR2. Am I correct?
Previous thread name:
AnandTech reviews Yonah
Last edited by impar on Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zetro
Canada's National Geek
Ultra nForced
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 2687
Location: Vancouver
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
yes
its 2.5V to 1.8V for DDR2 i believe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17739
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Greetings!
I was refering to the Watts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
krips
PS3ness
Ultra nForced
Joined: 25 Sep 2003
Posts: 7661
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, if DDR and DDR2 feed off of the same rail, then you still have your answer.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gilly
-- Meow --
Ultra nForced
Joined: 08 Feb 2004
Posts: 6016
Location: West Yorkshire | UK
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| it might use more current, i see what you mean impar. any samsung white papers on the matter? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Zetro
Canada's National Geek
Ultra nForced
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 2687
Location: Vancouver
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| impar wrote: |
Greetings!
I was refering to the Watts. |
http://www.extreme.outervision.com/index.jsp
with a lower core voltage the power consumption is 'generally' less
this site has a descent assumption, I was reading the forums on how he got these numbers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17739
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Greetings!
And I was digging on Samsung site:
From here somewhere:
http://product.samsung.com/semi/ddr2/
Last edited by impar on Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
impar
PC Gamer
Moderator
Joined: 21 Mar 2003
Posts: 17739
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Greetings!
So, somewhat back on topic, the difference on the systems reviewed by Anand are the motherboard, the CPU (one has more cache and made in 65nm, the other has a memory controller, 64bits and still on 90nm) and the RAM.
Last edited by impar on Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:34 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
powerarmour
--[papameister]--
Mod Squad
Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 11125
Location: Surrey, UK 'In Dead Space'
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Unbreakable
Deus Ex Machina
The nForced One
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 3461
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Who would've thought?  Intel is competitive again after 4 or 5 years of abstinence (in the desktop area)...  And it's gonna be even more interesting once they switch to on-die memory controllers *yummy* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
AdSense
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
nForcersHQ supporters: Impar, wardog, MiniMax, envoid, jasonh, Krips, VAIOMAN, Zetro, sensai, me&er, RElliott, ScottRempel, JHogarth, IcemanIX, Etraman, KA, Tabajara, Xiomberg, ruddywarrior, hookahmike, MMoore, RHodgson, RGilson, powerarmour, Sepal, RRavat, DigitalRuin, HammerheadTech, Bane, DHunt, Fat Jez, baikal, Jumpin' Jon, MGadzikowski, JBishop, RDeBok, JDavies, HDHyland, TMorris
|
|
| |
